the Wisdom of Men

The following has been written on December 5th 2024. - As you can see in Hebrew. - At first I did not intend to have it on the blog. But as you see it is.

- FWIW -

חכמתם של בני אדם

במדינה אחת לא היו אלא עיוורים בלבד. - ידוע היה שם בדבר האור. היו רואים בעבר. כבר לא ידוע מתי. - אבל מסיבה שאינה ידועה דווקא לא עוד ראו התושבים שם בעיניהם. מפאת הזמן הרב שחלף גם לא עוד האמינו כֻּלָּם באמיתות הדברים הנושנים בדבר היכולת המופלאה שאינה עוד מוכרת.

- המדע חקר את הנושא. נמצאו כתבים בעניין. - נותרו אולי כתבים ואולי אפילו ספרים ממשיים של רואים של ממש אשר לא ראו צֹרֶך מיוחד להתייחס לנושא מכיון שלא חזו את הבאות. - לא התייחסו לתופעה כמופלאה אלא פשוט מטבע הדברים ארע שנזכרה בטבעיות בדבריהם. - והיו גם דברי המדענים.

- אלה חקרו והעמיקו בנידון. כתבו ספרים וספרים נוספים ועוד כרכים באותו עניין שממשיכי דרכם נמצאו מסוגלים לקרא ולהתעניין בהם. - הכירו ראשית את הספרים העתיקים שלא הוקירו את המדע דווקא ושבו והביאו גם הם עצמם את מחשבותיהם הרבות והמתרבות שוב ושוב בעולמה של האקדמיה. - עלו תאוריות מתאוריות שונות בהתייחס לתופעה המוזרה הנשמעת כְּנֵס גמור. - ישבו תלמידים שנה אחר שנה ולמדו והשכילו ואחר הפכו תלמידי מחקר ואחר חוקרים שאינם נקראים תלמידים עוד. - מבנה מורכב של רעיונות שונים המפרים זה את זה הלך והתהווה עד שנדרשו שנים של שקידה ופקחות לא מבוטלת ע״מ לעמד על מלוא היקפו ועל פרטיו הרבים.

ופשוטי העם ידעו כמובן בדבר כך. וזכו המשכילים באותו עניין, כבעניינים אחרים, - שם - לכבוד והוקרה - במידת מה לכל הפחות, - מכלל הציבור. - אין זאת דווקא שעמד העניין בראש מעייניהן של הבריות ככלל שם יום יום, - אך ככל שנזכר או הוזכר מובן היה שיכולותיהם של העוסקים בדבר אינן יכולותיו של כלל הציבור והמדובר בבבני אדם שאין להקל ראש בכשרונם.

עשו הנוגעים בדבר כמיטב יכולתם לעניין זה והידע נראה היה כהולך ומתרחב, - אף ששפת-הדברים והעגה המקצועית המתפתחת לא נהירים היו, - כדרכם של דברים מסוג זה, - לכלל הבריות. - הגיגים רבים בעניין התמונה הנתפסת בעין שלא עוד מוכרת היתה שם עלו וצצו, - ותאוריות מבריקות לכאורה התפתחו עד כי רֹאשָׁן בשמים כמגדל בבל. - לא היו העושים במלאכה מקלים ראש ברצינות עיסוקם, ולא מצאוהו מבדח או קליל, שלא לומר כמובן חסר ערך. לא יתכן כך.

יום אחד, - כדבר מופלא שבמופלא, - נמצא אדם שראייתו החלה מופיעה. ראשית כהבחנה גרידא בין אור לְחֹשֶׂךְ. יום ולילה. - לא הבין תחילה, - יתכן, - משמעות הדבר. אחר באיטיות רבה ובקצב שאינו מובחן אפילו בנקל קנה מבלי שעשה דבר לשם כך תחילתה של ראייה. וזו מתבהרת ומתבהרת לאיטה ומתחדדת עד להבנה ראשיתית האומרת רְאִיָה מהי.

פנה, כבר בראשית הדברים, - אל העוסקים בתחום באחת האוניברסיטאות הידועות. - פגש פרופסור ידוע שֵׂם וּבִּקֵּשׂ להתייחס בפניו אל התופעה שאבדה כאמור בנבכי העבר הלא-ידוע. – האחרון בא לידי תמיהה רבה, - כיצד זה אדם פשוט שאינו משכיל כלל יבקש לבוא ולומר כך או אחרת שעה שאחרים כידוע באים לידי לימוד רב וכבד-משקל שנים רבות, - תוך שמכירים הם ביסודיות רבה שֶׁשּׁוֹטֶה לא יהא מסוגל לה את כתבי-קודמיהם הרבים-אף-הם, - רוצה לומר נוכח כישוריהם ושקדנותם של אלה? - מסר המלומד לאדם האמור כי ראשית מוטב לו שימצא את דרכו אל חוג מתחילים הפותחים בלימודיהם בשנתם הראשונה, - וישקוד במידה הראויה, - ויכיר וילמד כדרכם של רבים את מחשבותיהם של רָמֵי הדעת שעסקו בעניין בעבר הקרוב והרחוק, - ואין מקום כי יאוץ וינהג בגובה לב מתמיה ובלתי סביר. - הניח האיש לאותו אדם ופנה לאחר. ושוב נתקל בתשובה דומה. היאך זאת מבקש בור, ואולי אפילו בור גמור, - להטריח ולהטריד מלומדים מן השורה הראשונה מבלי שלמד דבר? - ושוב נִסָּה האיש, - ופנה בנמיכות אל מי אחר אשר לא נמצא דווקא מגדולי המשכילים אף כי אף הוא מאנשי הממסד האקדמי ומלומד גם הוא שאינו קוטל קנים, - מי מן המשכילים שקנו שנים של לימוד ומחקר אך אינם מן הידועים ביותר דווקא, - ושוב, - גם אם בעדינות רבה יותר אולי, - הוצע לו לעסק בהכרת-כתביהם-המלומדים-של-המדענים-קודמיו, - טרם שיבקש - כמובן - להציע מחשבות או רעיונות משל עצמו.

- לעניינו של אותו אדם, - כאמור, - גם אם תחילה לא התוודע אלא אל יכולת ראשונית להמצא מסוגל לומר באם חשיכה סביב או אור, - (דבר שיתכן וְיִמָּצֵא חסר משמעות לדידם של הסובבים אותו) הרי שאעפ״כ לאחר מכן מצא עצמו מתקדם, עקב בצד אגודל, - ובלא להדרש לכוונה כלשהי מצידו דווקא, - לקראת ראייה של ממש. - אם ראשית בפנותו אל אנשי האקדמיה הָווּ דבריו וראייתו עמומים ותחיליים, - בהמשך לכך הָוָוה כאמור. - גם בטחונו, - בעל כרחו דווקא, - ומטבע הדברים, - גבר. ושב וְנִסָּה עקב כך ושב ונסה לטעון דברים בפני ראשי הציבור העוסקים בתחום. המלומדים כמקדם שרבים היו במוסדות שונים ששמם במקרים רבים הולך לפניהם. - ותחילה זכה לתשובות מנומסות של בני אדם שכל רצונם שלא יפריעם מלעסק במלאכתם-רבת-החשיבות ולא יגזול מזמנם, העומדים על בורותו ופקחותו שאינה מן החריגות, - המבקשים להבהיר לו את המובן מאליו הידוע בד״כ לתלמידיהם אף טרם שיחלו בלימודיהם. - ועם שלא חדל מדרכו והוסיף וּבִּקֵּשׂ להציג חידושו הפך ידוע ומוכר במידת מה בחוגים המדוברים, - ונזכר שמו ככלל בחיוך סלחני ומשועשע של הפקחים שבבני אדם. - כך היה ומובן - הלא - לכל, - כי דרך אחרת אֵין. - התרחב שמו ההולך לפניו עד כי עוד טרם יאמר דבר מובן היה המצב. - ובמידה של יאוש בִּקֵּשׂ דרך אחרת, - ופנה כשנזדמן לו אף אל אחרים שאינם מגדולי המלומדים ואף אינם מלומדים ביסודו של דבר כלל והציג את שהיה בפיו. - וכמסתבר בין אלו היו דווקא מתי מעט שהיטו אמנם אוזן ומצאו עניין וראו חשיבות ובחרו שלא להרפות ממנו ומדרכו. אלא שמתי מעט אלו נותרו מתי מעט.

ככלל נמצא האיש כהלצה. כך נראה. - לעג הווה מנת חלקו ומובן היה כי מקום שדבר אחר אינו עשוי להיות צפוי הטעם להוסיף ולפנות אל גבוהי המחשבה ומיומני הדעת מצומצם במובהק. ואינו הולך ומתרבה אלא להיפך.

- מקום שאמורים היו דברים בדברים חסרי-טעם והבלותיים הפך שמו לנרדף להם, - והיה לכינוי לַמְּגֻחָכִים וּלְעֲלוּבִים שבבני-אדם הנתפסים לרעיונות סרי טעם שאין בהם כלום ואין בהם ממש. - הכיצד יאמר נואש? עיניו הלא רואות את אשר לפניו. - אף לא יחפץ בכך הרי יום-יום ושעה-שעה עדות שלא יוכל להתכחש לה לנגד עיניו אלו. - ולמולו - מלומדים רבי-דעת ורבי-ידע אשר אינו מכיר אף את תחילתו - וְיִמָּצֵא ”ידע“ זה חסר טעם וחסר ערך ככל שֶׂיִמָּצֵא. - עולם כמנהו נוהג, ומדינה כמידת חכמת בניה.

- קבוצה מצומצמת עִמּוֹ, - ומנודה הוא ע״י בני-אדם חפצים בטוב וטובי לב אשר יבינו אמנם כי אין לאוץ או להזדרז ולהעמיד פנים כי יודע הוא את אשר לא למד. - הַלְחִינָם שקידתם של רבי הדעת היושבים במגדל השן ומורמים הם מֵעָם? - כיצד יתכן? - אין זאת אלא כי גובה לִבּוֹ היה לו לרועץ והביאו לידי רעיונות שוא שאך שוטים - רחמנא ליצלן - יענו בהם. - ידוע הלא כי תקרה כזאת. יתכן ואדם שאינו משכמו ומעלה יפול קרבן לגאוותו זו וידמה בנפשו דבר - אך ע״מ להיטיב תחושתו ולדמות עצמו גדול וטוב יותר משהינו. - מובנים הדברים לכלל החברה. ומשעשע הוא. כמסתבר. אין כועסים עליו. ולמה יכעסו? רצונו, - יוסיף ויעסק בהבליו, - רק אל יגזל זמן רב מדי מזמנן של הבריות. - הַרְאִיָה - הבקיאים בקיאים בה. שנים ענו בנושא. שוב ושוב. יום יום. רבים יֵדְעוּ זאת. - וחכמים מקרב החברה והיישוב יבינו מצב הדברים ולא יבטלו זמנם, - שלא לומר משאביהם, - על רעיונות סרק של תמהונים מסוג זה. סוף דבר, - הכל טוב, - הכל לטובה, - אין רעה, - ואין רעה כאן. - וְיִשָּׁכַח אדם זה עם השנים כמו גם רעיונותיו המוזרים, - שאינם הולמים את האינטליגנציה המשמעותית הנדרשת לשם התקדמות החברה במסלולה הבלתי-ידוע.

ואם אל בשמים יצחק או יבכה, - וימים רחוקים יזמנו אולי אמת, - אך עתה השטות תמשול בכיפה, - והעדר יוסיף כדרכו משכילה.

At present I don't know when will I schedule it. But I will later. So far.

End of post.

(12.5.2025) - Fuck them all - (12.5.2025)

People seem to be generally altogether blind to the fact intellectualism shallows a person’s mind. - Not only intellectuals I guess. - Those who have the tendency to be or become intellectuals may be likely to miss the point. - What is intellectuality? - What is it? - There is this kind of thinking. - What is it about? - It is not about seeing things. It is not about seeing reality. - It is not about noticing fine details or subtle phenomena before one’s eyes. - It generally always is about mere deduction. Sometime right, sometimes wrong. - An intelligent person can understand a list or a structure of details presented to him. (Or her) This is in a way a very rough ability. - People possessing it sometimes have a very poor personality in other aspects. - Though typically such ones will be unable to appreciate the value of what they lack.

- Things can be quite amazing, - as I have come to testify to recently. - It may be accepted that children too, - clearly and unarguably while not having acquired maturity, - possibly in any way at all, - can be at times very intelligent. - This is not a new argument, - I believe. - Wisdom is not like that. - It is fundamentally related to one’s personality. - For observing reality, - intelligence alone - merely being clever, - is never enough. It can only assist other abilities. Else than very easy or simple cases. - Understanding one’s surroundings and situation in an integral manner as a practical and real tool relies on something else. - But when one - out of not being aware of what I am trying to say here, - adheres to intellectuality, - adopts it into his or her personality, - fills his or her mind and thought with this rough manner of constructing things, - then other - more significant and refined abilities humans are endowed with, - may degenerate.

Or may not develop if this is in an early age when they have naturally not appeared yet.

- Intellectual thinking is detached thinking. - Fundamentally it does not have a living link to reality. Intellectuals would not understand what this is all about. - Intellectuality is basically about receiving a set of details and concluding what one can off them. - There is no harmony, - no living sense of measure, - no integral ability of seeing in depth beyond this. - It is quite unrelated to one’s inner qualities. We know today no man can beat a computer in chess. - But a computer can never match the initial learning of a baby since birth up to his (or her) third year. - A troublesome point is that just for those this is meaningful it may be far from easy to understand the issue. - You will not understand it intellectually. - You need to apply a different kind of thinking. - Not one absent, necessarily, - but one that would be often and typically put aside by the silly guys involved. - The features necessary for the more essential levels of thought are altogether different, - and the tendency among intellectuals with their materialistic ideas and tendency will be to altogether be unable to understand the value of developing them. - To look down at these. - Their abilities to work on these will - at first at least, - not be great, - because of the degeneration caused by emphasizing this shallow level of thought, - but anyway they are far from appreciating the need, - among other things at least because of living where others too share the similar attitudes.

- The degeneration caused may not be paralleled to a computer. - It is also a matter of what happens in the body. - While certain features gain the resources others lose. If muscles work they develop. No secret. - Also with other things. But here the situation seems to be that while resources are channeled one way other potential abilities lose, - particularly when these are things perhaps somewhat hidden, - which anyway do need some intentional development off one’s life. - So while one - a man or a woman, - most likely already as a child, - treads this wrong path, - and qualifies his or her thinking only in this obvious and rough manner and route, - stupidity takes place, - often, - and the wrong view thus coming about keeps one from changing things in a hopeful manner. In the past things have not been like this. Though of course man was not more developed. - It is not so much that people today are [potentially] worse, - but rather the situation drives some – not few, - in this miserable path losing liveliness and essence. It may be unnecessary to add that those referred to would often find this reference to essence quite meaningless, - “what is essence?” - they might ask, - imagining it is nothing more than an emotional idea of those inferior to them. Such is the world. So far.

Prize and punishment

I once read a “Zen” story, I don't know or don't remember where, - about a monk, - or maybe not a monk, asking his teacher, - “where will you go after you die?”.

In spite of what is said here, - none of the quotes here is necessarily supposed to be exact. I don't even remember when I read this.

- The master replied: - “Straight to hell”. – “How come?” - the student wondered. – “Otherwise, - who is going to be there to save lost souls such as yourself?” – replied the master whose name I don't remember.

- In the last answer I even wrote somewhat more freely, - but it does not seem to matter. – The point is about wages we get or are supposed to get from Heaven in accord with our good or bad deeds. - Essential it is not. – In a way they are treating us like a herd of cows. How should we relate to these? - I am not in Heaven. I do not have their view. But it does not seem pleasant. - In a way it might seem even ugly. Jesus speaks about it a lot. But Jesus lived about 2,000 years ago. Master Dogen speak about the reality of karma, - of these facts being real, - (as much as this world or any other are real) but he does not tell us we should not act in accord with them. Nishijima says Master Dogen [usually?] write four chapters about each issue. We know Master Dogen intended to add 25 chapters to those he has written for the Shobogenzo. So perhaps it would have been found there. As far as I remember there are only three relevant chapters in the Shobogenzo. We are never free of our individual karma as far as I know until enlightenment. Is this not disappointing? I think teachers should at least emphasize we should not act in a wish to get these rewards from Heaven. Suppose we would get a negative outcome off a good deed and a [personally] beneficial one for a good deed - how should we act? Would this justify evil or wrongness?

I am not in the place of Heaven. I have not acquired their wisdom or their knowledge. - But somehow this issue seems to suck.

I wish teachers, enlightened teachers that is, - would direct those following them or listening to them in accord with what I am saying here. Even If a teacher says once in a while you should not seek gain in this way but continually tells of these rewards and payments, as you might perhaps call them, - you would naturally wonder what it is really that he is pointing to. – I don't know the souls of all, - but actually you might say both positive and negative such implanted outcomes are bending our soul, our being, twisting it somewhat, - both for the worse that is. This world seems truly an unhappy one.

Enlightenment in the New Testament

This post is somewhat related to this post here. Still it stands on its own.

Jesus speaks of the Kingdom of God. - Of the Kingdom of Heaven too.

There is no such place.

He says so himself.

          - “The kingdom of God will not come with an eyes observation. - Nor will they say [- oh] here [it is] or [- oh] there [it is] for the kingdom of God is within yourselves.”.

Luke 17:20-21.

Matthew 11:27 says:

(...) “None knows the Son apart from the Father and none knows the Father apart from the Son and he to whom the Son would wish to reveal to”.

He who knows the Father is he who has arrived at the Kingdom of God. - Or the Kingdom of Heaven.

So to speak.

- The expression is a manner of relating to what is known in Eastern paths as enlightenment. - Saying one has arrived at the kingdom of God or the Kingdom of heaven is a way of saying one has arrived at what elsewhere is related to as Buddhahood. - Knowing the Father is nothing else but knowing yourself. - Jesus was referring to that which is known in the school of “Zen” as “Satori” as arriving at the Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Heaven. This is from Kalo but It seems quite clear any master who has come to it could equally affirm the fact.

- This is what this post is about. - In the Lord's Prayer (not quoted here) in particular asking for the Father's Kingdom to come (- in the second verse of the prayer) is about this. - Kalo relates to this somewhere. It is very clear.
- Subsequently I will bring various quotes off the Bible relating to the matter. - It is most clear that this is not always the meaning, - the expressions are very often used in a way where obviously this is not the meaning intended, - while as well else than this Jesus clearly and obviously was not intending for the meaning related to here in this post to be particularly or generally understood by those hearing his words or those hearing or reading them in any near future. - It is not like in Eastern paths. - Whatever the reason. - I have somewhat related to this in an earlier post.
- Here are the quotes:

Luke 16:16:

“The law and the prophets [are] till John; since then the Kingdom of God is proclaimed good news, and every one doth press into it”.

Matthew 11:11-13:

“Verily I say to you, there hath not risen, among those born of women, a greater than John the Baptist, but he who is least in the Kingdom of Heaven is greater than he. And, from the days of John the Baptist till now, the Kingdom of the Heaven doth suffer violence, and violent men do take it by force, for all the prophets and the law till John did prophesy”.

Matthew 19:16-24:

“And lo, one having come near, said to him, ‘Good teacher, what good thing shall I do, that I may have life age-during?’ And he said to him, ‘Why me dost thou call good? no one [is] good except One -- God; but if thou dost will to enter into the life, keep the commands.’ He saith to him, ‘What kind?’ And Jesus said, ‘Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not bear false witness, honour thy father and mother, and, thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.’ The young man saith to him, ‘All these did I keep from my youth; what yet do I lack?’ Jesus said to him, ‘If thou dost will to be perfect, go away, sell what thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come, follow me.’ And the young man, having heard the word, went away sorrowful, for he had many possessions; and Jesus said to his disciples, ‘Verily I say to you, that hardly shall a rich man enter into the Kingdom of the Heaven; and again I say to you, it is easier for a camel through the eye of a needle to go, than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God.’”.

Mark 10:17-25:

“And as he is going forth into the way, one having run and having kneeled to him, was questioning him, ‘Good teacher, what may I do, that life age-during I may inherit?’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Why me dost thou call good? no one [is] good except One -- God; the commands thou hast known: Thou mayest not commit adultery, Thou mayest do no murder, Thou mayest not steal, Thou mayest not bear false witness, Thou mayest not defraud, Honour thy father and mother.’ And he answering said to him, ‘Teacher, all these did I keep from my youth.’ And Jesus having looked upon him, did love him, and said to him, ‘One thing thou dost lack; go away, whatever thou hast -- sell, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come, be following me, having taken up the cross.’ And he -- gloomy at the word -- went away sorrowing, for he was having many possessions. And Jesus having looked round, saith to his disciples, ‘How hardly shall they who have riches enter into the Kingdom of God!’ And the disciples were astonished at his words, and Jesus again answering saith to them, ‘Children, how hard is it to those trusting on the riches to enter into the Kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel through the eye of the needle to enter, than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God.’”.

Luke 18:18-25:

“And a certain ruler questioned him, saying, `Good teacher, what having done -- shall I inherit life age-during?’ And Jesus said to him, ‘Why me dost thou call good? no one [is] good, except One -- God; the commands thou hast known: Thou mayest not commit adultery, Thou mayest do no murder, Thou mayest not steal, Thou mayest not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother.’ And he said, ‘All these I did keep from my youth;’ and having heard these things, Jesus said to him, ‘Yet one thing to thee is lacking; all things -- as many as thou hast -- sell, and distribute to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come, be following me;’ and he, having heard these things, became very sorrowful, for he was exceeding rich. And Jesus having seen him become very sorrowful, said, ‘How hardly shall those having riches enter into the Kingdom of God! for it is easier for a camel through the eye of a needle to enter, than for a rich man into the Kingdom of God to enter.’”.

Matthew 7:21:

“Not every one who is saying to me Lord, lord, shall come into the Kingdom of Heaven; but he who is doing the will of my Father in Heaven”.

Matthew 23:13:

“Wo to you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because ye shut up the Kingdom of Heaven before men, for ye do not go in, nor those going in do ye suffer to enter.”.

Mark 4:30-32:

“And he said, ‘To what may we liken the Kingdom of God, or in what simile may we compare it? As a grain of mustard, which, whenever it may be sown on the earth, is less than any of the seeds that are on the earth; and whenever it may be sown, it cometh up, and doth become greater than any of the herbs, and doth make great branches, so that under its shade the fowls of the heaven are able to rest.'”.

Luke 13:18-19:

“And he said, ‘To what is the Kingdom of God like? And to what shall I liken it? It is like to a grain of mustard, which a man having taken, did cast into his garden, and it increased, and came to a great tree, and the fowls of the heavens did rest in its branches.’”.

Mark 4:26-28:

“And he said, ‘Thus is the Kingdom of God: as if a man may cast the seed on the earth, and may sleep, and may rise night and day, and the seed spring up and grow, he hath not known how; for of itself doth the earth bear fruit, first a blade, afterwards an ear, afterwards full corn in the ear’”.

- See also verses 21-22 in the same context.
- Also compare to Kodo Sawaki Roshi saying that there is no way not to become a Buddha. - The allegory he is giving is of the night trains in Japan which carry you along even when you are sleeping.

Matthew 13:45-46:

(...) “The Kingdom of Heaven is like to a man, a merchant, seeking goodly pearls, who having found one pearl of great price, having gone away, hath sold all, as much as he had, and bought it.”.

Matthew 13:44:

(...) “The Kingdom of Heaven is like to treasure hid in the field, which a man having found did hide, and from his joy goeth, and all, as much as he hath, he selleth, and buyeth that field”.

Mark 12:28-34:

“And one of the scribes having come near, having heard them disputing, knowing that he answered them well, questioned him, ‘Which is the first command of all?’ and Jesus answered him -- ‘The first of all the commands [is], Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God [is] one Lord; and thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all of thy soul, and with all thine mentality, and with of all thy wishfulness -- this [is] the first command; and the second [is] like [it], this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself; -- greater than these there is no other command.’ And the scribe said to him, ‘Well, Teacher, in truth thou hast spoken that there is one God, and there is none other but He; and to love Him with all of the heart, and with all of the mentality, and with all of the soul, and with all of the endeavouring, and to love one's neighbour as one's self, is more than all the whole burnt-offerings and the sacrifices.’ And Jesus, having seen him that he answered with wisdom, said to him, ‘Thou art not far from the Kingdom of God;’ and no one any more durst question him.”.

Luke 13:20-21:

“And again he said, `To what shall I liken the Kingdom of God? It is like leaven, which a woman, having taken, did hide in three measures of meal, till that all was leavened.’”.

Matthew 13:33:

“Another simile spake he to them: ‘The Kingdom of Heaven is like to leaven, which a woman having taken, hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.’”.

Mark 10:35-40:

“And there come near to him James and John, the sons of Zebedee, saying, ‘Teacher, we wish that whatever we may ask for ourselves, thou mayest do for us;’ and he said to them, ‘What do ye wish me to do for you?’ and they said to him, ‘Grant to us that, one on thy right hand and one on thy left, we may sit in thy glory;’ and Jesus said to them, ‘Ye have not known what ye ask; are ye able to drink of the cup that I drink of, and with the baptism that I am baptized with -- to be baptized?’ And they said to him, ‘We are able;’ and Jesus said to them, ‘Of the cup indeed that I drink of, ye shall drink, and with the baptism that I am baptized with, ye shall be baptized; but to sit on my right and on my left, is not mine to give, but -- to those for whom it hath been prepared.’”.

Matthew 20:20-23:

“Then came near to him the mother of the sons of Zebedee, with her sons, bowing and asking something from him, and he said to her, ‘What wilt thou?’ She saith to him, ‘Say, that they may sit -- these my two sons -- one on thy right hand, and one on the left, in thy Kingdom.’ And Jesus answering said, ‘Ye have not known what ye ask for yourselves; are ye able to drink of the cup that I am about to drink? and with the baptism that I am baptized with, to be baptized?’ They say to him, ‘We are able.’ And he saith to them, ‘Of my cup indeed ye shall drink, and with the baptism that I am baptized with ye shall be baptized; but to sit on my right hand and on my left is not mine to give, but -- to those for whom it hath been prepared by my Father.’”.

Mark 10:13-16:

“And they were bringing to him children, that he might touch them, and the disciples were rebuking those bringing them, and Jesus having seen, was much displeased, and he said to them, ‘Suffer the children to come unto me, and forbid them not, for of such is the Kingdom of God; verily I say to you, whoever may not receive the Kingdom of God, as a child -- he may not enter into it;’ and having taken them in his arms, having put [his] hands upon them, he was blessing them.”.

Luke 18:15-17:

“And they were bringing near also the babes, that he may touch them, and the disciples having seen did rebuke them, and Jesus having called them near, said, ‘Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not, for of such is the Kingdom of God; verily I say to you, Whoever may not receive the Kingdom of God as a little child, may not enter into it.’”.

Matthew 19:13-15:

“Then were brought near to him children that he might put hands on them and pray, and the disciples rebuked them. But Jesus said, ‘Suffer the children, and forbid them not, to come unto me, for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven;’ and having laid on them [his] hands, he departed thence.”.

Matthew 18:1-14:

“At that hour came the disciples near to Jesus, saying, ‘Who, now, is greater in the Kingdom of Heaven?’ And Jesus having called near a child, did set him in the midst of them, and said, ‘Verily I say to you, if ye may not be turned and become as the children, ye may not enter into the Kingdom of Heaven; whoever then may humble himself as this child, he is the greater in the Kingdom of Heaven. ‘And he who may receive one such child in my name, doth receive me, and whoever may cause to stumble one of those little ones who are believing in me, it is better for him that a weighty millstone may be hanged upon his neck, and he may be sunk in the depth of the sea. ‘Wo to the world from the stumbling-blocks! For there is a necessity for the stumbling-blocks to come, but wo to that man through whom the stumbling-block doth come! ‘And if thy hand or thy foot doth cause thee to stumble, cut them off and cast from thee; it is good for thee to enter into the life lame or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet, to be cast to the fire the age-during. ‘And if thine eye doth cause thee to stumble, pluck it out and cast from thee; it is good for thee one-eyed to enter into the life, rather than having two eyes to be cast to the gehenna of the fire. ‘Beware! -- Ye may not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you, that their angels in the heavens do always behold the face of my Father in Heaven, for the Son of Man did come to save the lost. ‘What think ye? If a man may have an hundred sheep, and there may go astray one of them, doth he not -- having left the ninety-nine, having gone on the mountains -- seek that which is gone astray? And if it may come to pass that he doth find it, verily I say to you, that he doth rejoice over it more than over the ninety-nine that have not gone astray; so it is not will in presence of your Father in Heaven, that one of these little ones may perish.”.

I here used the Young Literal Translation. The first two quotes I translated myself. I usually translate myself Bible quotes here but this was clearly too much work. I don't know how good is the Young translation, or how well it delivers what is present behind the words of those who wrote the Gospels. Generally I recall relating to the Old Testament no translation seemed good to me. - Jewish translations seemed better than others, I thought because made by people actually able to speak Hebrew as a living language rather than scholars relying on dictionaries and written matter, - but I am not sure about this. You can see in King I 21:19 where the Hebrew word is “inherited” almost none of the translations gives this word. - Also for “murdered” [there] many give “kill”, - while the Hebrew words are clear and explicit. - As for things here, - in this post, - I don't know which translation is best or if there is any that is good. It seemed to me the Amplified Bible and the Message were better than others but this is of no thorough reading or anything close to it. - So it could most certainly be wrong. - Therefore I did not want to choose any translation in the links I supplied here but you can choose any one you like in the window which opens. - Luke 9:27 I did not include within the quotes above though the meaning of the Kingdom of God there is clearly that related to here in this post.

Since Young gives “the reign of God” instead of “the Kingdom of God” and “the reign of the heavens” rather than “the Kingdom of Heaven” I changed this everywhere. I might guess this has to do with the Greek translation of Hebrew or Aramic words while Young clings to the Greek ignoring the source. - I changed somewhat elsewhere too. - Me not being a native English speaker certainly was and is a barrier to being able to choose a translation. But as I said, - I am not even sure there is a good one at all. - So far about this.

- While writing this post I wrote another blog page which obviously has to do with the post I linked at the beginning. - Also the point about which this post is appears in this other post linked in the beginning too. - I do not ague about it. [Here]

One most clear thing relating to the translations again is that none of them of course is aware of the fact. The fact about which this is, of course, - that is.

If you want to be convinced go and ask. But you need to know who to ask, - whether you take it for granted or not. - Only one who is “there” will do, - and those are no doubt rare, - very rare, - and in our weird time they are not so widely acknowledged as those who have “arrived” at what nothing will match.

As for my self I see no doubt.


So far.

Faith

What is faith? Apparently, - the idea of belief seems to imply not knowing. What you know you know. As for what you don't you might assume this or that.

- However quite obviously in religion the idea feels different. - One might say the very idea is irrational because it does not make sense treasuring having assumptions about what you don't know. And quite correctly perhaps one might say too that if you do know, - you need not call it faith.

- A baby, - normally, - knows nothing. When it is born, - that is. - The speed in which learning seems to prove itself, - perhaps both in humans and in animals, - may seem funny, - much quicker than what may reasonably be expected, - but this is not of the issue here. - But as for the baby, - the newborn one, - right after its appearance it begins to accumulate what seems to be knowledge relating to its surroundings. - He (or she) learns slowly, - though as I said perhaps much quicker than what might have been natural according to materialistic assumptions or ideas, - and in order to function, - qualifies itself.

- This process of course goes on much further through a more advanced age. - When will one attain “faith”?

- Some might believe in God or something else simply because they have been told what they have been told since the youngest age. Could this be called faith?

Most obviously, - it is truly easy to find practical idiots who would seem to have faith if you are observing it on the shallowest plain. - Should those be called men and women of faith. I would say quite unequivocally they would better not. Though materialistic intellectuals would gladly think otherwise. Despising faith that is. - Faith is not at first about having this or that opinion. - Faith is a quality of the heart. – Fundamentally. I would say. - You might say otherwise too, - but it wouldn't lead us to meaningful understanding, here at least. - Why do we speak of faith? We don't speak of it equally relating to other issues. - Is there a “God”? Is there a Heaven? Does our mind really originate merely in random occurrences of physical matter? - If there is a “God” - what is it?

When Jesus speaks of the “Father in Heaven” - he is clearly relating to what may be known elsewhere (mainly in Eastern paths perhaps) as the original reality or the original mind. - But is it the same when we are hearing of “God” or “the Lord” earlier in the Jewish Bible? I don't know. – You thought you were going to find answers in these words. Perhaps you will.

But as for faith, - and back to the baby, - there is the learning. Thinking, - human thinking at least, - may be divided into three parts, - I would say. – There is the intellectual thinking, relating to the head I guess, which is the most shallow layer. - Next there is a second phase I don't think there is a word for in English, - (in Hebrew there is) related to the heart. And next there is wisdom, - having in a way at least to do with the body. - Intellectuality is like a pencil's drawing. It has no depth. - Wisdom, - I would say, - is about having a picture of reality. - Not just concluding A is true because of B and so on. - And faith, - how does it appear? It would be about an inner ability undefined (at first at least) through which a cleaner heart might gradually (at first) grasp the nature of things.

Had the materialistic ideas held by many these days been true there would be no room for these things to be spoken of.

But quite obviously, - one cannot convince all intellectual materialists of the truth related to here through the mere means they cherish. - Otherwise the world would be so much different. - I haven't explained so much. It is not easy. - But at a certain point one can say positively as a matter of fact that a certain ability of thinking is acquired. This is when one acquires true faith. True faith is not yet perfect faith. But it is no emotional thing.

In making progress through life, - in learning, - since the moment we are born, - we might also learn how to learn. - It is necessary - it seems - that this improves too.

Intellectuals are blocked somewhere relating to this. As Jesus said - he who has shall be given, - these guys are depriving themselves of progress since they have their views which will lead them all the wrong ways in relation to this. - But generally things change, - for them too, - when one matures. - Not all people are of the same starting point. Need this be said? - Again, - here - intellectuals will measure thing altogether wrongly. - But anyway a very shallow or dry-minded person initially without any inner substance or significance will at first advance very slowly. Through incarnations we can get better each time. - How does one come to faith? - It is not through the study of mathematics. (Though in ancient Greek such a path existed too) It is not through mere conclusion making based on what most assume they know today. - It is through some sort of a finer thing. An ability you might say is more refined. - And as for communicating it, - it much depends on where is this other one you want to speak to. - The closer this one is the better are the chances of the communication. You might check Mark 12:28-34 but it is not necessarily exactly fit for my discussion here. - Not knowing what wisdom is, - one will never have a sufficient understanding or view of what faith is. One can not be truly wise and have zero faith. The two come closer as they advance. - You can not expect to figure out what all this is about using merely intellectual thinking. You need to let go and look at your picture of the world. And this article here is not a magical one. It is not supposed to necessarily make a notable difference after one reads it. It's obvious. - One the intention is that it would make its contribution. - Even if an incomplete one. - So far.

Plus there are those who have got the perfect thing, - as they say, - ineffable achievement beyond any doubt, - but as for this you better get the message directly from such one, though quite clearly you will not understand it, nor will I.

Until the day comes, that is.

October 20, 2024.

I all the time schedule posts now.